The Planning Process

Community Master Planning Process
Simply stated, the master planning process involves performing an assessment of existing conditions in the community, which are then compared against the community’s expressed vision and goals for the future of their city. The juxtaposition of these two elements then leads to the identification of opportunities for accomplishing community goals. It is a very user-intensive process wherein the planner serves as a conduit through which community goals are transformed into concrete and achievable projects, programs and policies.

A fundamental assumption imbedded within the process is the commitment of the local community or user group to participate in the planning process. In essence, the master plan process requires that a partnership of trust and honesty be established between the planners and the community. Participants generally fall into one of three important categories:

  1. The citizenry, or members of the community.
  2. The project “owner” or community leadership. An elected official such as mayor or governor, a board of directors, a CEO, or a governing body can carry out this role.
  3. The professional consulting entity or other professional entity.

Each entity has a vital role to play, and actions by one partner are often required so that the other may proceed to subsequent steps in the process.

The Master Planning Process proceeds through four phases. Although distinct, sometimes the phases overlap. The phases are:

Phase I - Inventory, Assessment, and Goals
In this phase the existing conditions are inventoried, mapped and assessed to establish a starting point. In essence, the planners construct a portrait of the community, as it exists today, so that realistic decisions can be made about the future. The assessment provides an evaluation of the existing conditions when compared to: other successful communities, best planning practices, regional influences, and future trends. Visioning and Goal setting requires meaningful community participation. Community ideas are gathered at open community meetings, interviews, and via an interactive web site established for this purpose. Of vital importance, the identified vision and goals will be used to guide the direction and emphasis of the rest of the master planning process.

Phase II - Analysis, Synthesis, and Preliminary Plan
In this phase, the vision and goals are combined with the assessment of existing conditions to identify opportunities, problem areas, and issues that need to be addressed in the master plan. This leads to summary mapping and delineation of alternative futures for the community. When community consensus is achieved, a draft master plan is mapped for review.

Phase III - Implementation Strategies and Final Plan
In the end, a plan is only as good as its execution. This phase is focused upon identifying strategies for implementing plan recommendations. Areas of focus that are broadly applicable to community needs are identified. Design schematics and graphics are developed to illustrate desired outcomes, attract funding opportunities and inspire community investment. Recommended design guidelines and community standards are tested and reviewed for community approval before being incorporated into the final master plan.

Phase IV - Plan Implementation and Evaluation
In the final phase, the planner’s work decreases while the community’s work must increase. Getting organized, setting priorities and sequences, and managing the implementation are assisted by consultants but must be driven by community commitment. In the RAMP process, this phase will also be enhanced by the RAMP website which will provide ongoing monitoring of the implementation process.